CLLR BURNETT BAULKS AT COSTS OF BY-ELECTION TO REPLACE SHAMED COLLEAGUE

Cllr Lis Burnett (Labour St Augustines) Deputy Leader of the Vale of Glamorgan Council

Cllr Lis Burnett (Labour St Augustines) Deputy Leader of the Vale of Glamorgan Council

Cllr Lis Burnett, (Labour St Augustines) Deputy Leader of the Vale of Glamorgan Council has queried the cost involved in holding a council by-election to replace a disgraced former colleague  Cllr Rob Curtis  who resigned from his Gibbonsdown (Barry) seat at the end of August .

At  the beginning of 2015 Cllr Curtis was – like Cllr Burnett –  a member of the Vale of Glamorgan’s ruling ‘cabinet’ – the small cabal which actually runs the Vale Council and takes all the major decisions.

Disgraced  councillor Rob Curtis - whose resignation created a vacant seat on the Vale of  Glamorgan Council

Disgraced councillor Rob Curtis – whose resignation created a vacant seat on the Vale of Glamorgan Council

Curtis – an electrician by profession – stepped down from his £30,000 a year ‘cabinet’ position citing pressure of work early last year – but retained his ordinary salaried seat on the council .

Only later did it emerge he was facing trial at Haverfordwest Magistrates Court after an incident involving a 17-year-old girl on a birdwatching expedition on the island of Skomer off the Pembrokeshire Coast. In May 2015 a charge of sexual assault was dropped and Curtis admitted common assault –  but despite being urged to quit by Cllr Shirley Hodges (Plaid Barry Town Council)  did not budge from his ordinary councillor’s seat on the Vale of Glamorgan Council.

Curtis’s case was referred to the  Ombudsman for Wales – who, on 22 February 2016, referred the matter to the Adjudication Panel for Wales.

The Adjudication Panel’s “Case Tribunal” found by “unanimous decision” that Cllr Curtis has “failed to comply with the Vale of Glamorgan Council Code of Conduct ” and he was suspended. He resigned at the end of August this year leaving a so-called “casual vacancy” in the Vale Council’s Gibbonsdown Ward.

The rules dictate that at least two Vale electors needed submit a formal request to trigger a by-election –  and that has now happened.

Cllr Burnett's tweet - querying the cost of holding a Vale by-election to replace Cllr Rob Curtis

Cllr Burnett’s tweet – querying the cost of holding a Vale by-election to replace Cllr Rob Curtis

The by-election has been duly scheduled for  November 3 – but now, on Twitter, Cllr Lis Burnett has publicly queried the necessity of holding a by-election at all – arguing that the next local authority elections are due to be held in May next year in “6 mths” .

She asserts that holding by-election now –  rather than waiting for the main elections in  May – will cost the council £5,000.

In fact none of the councillors on the Vale Council has a current electoral mandate because in 2012 they were elected originally for what was only a 4-year term and had their terms of office arbitrarily extended by the Welsh Labour Government for an extra year  – which ends in May 2017.

 

 

About NewsNet

Penarth Daily News email address dmj@newsnet.uk . Penarth Daily News is an independent free on-line fair and balanced news service published by NewsNet Ltd covering the town of Penarth in the Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, UK. All our news items are based on the information we receive or discover at the time of publication and are published on the basis that they are accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief at that time.
This entry was posted in Penarth Daily News. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to CLLR BURNETT BAULKS AT COSTS OF BY-ELECTION TO REPLACE SHAMED COLLEAGUE

  1. Anne says:

    Some cheek by Lis Burnett to complain about the cost of the by-election as it is her labour party colleagues bad behaviour – common assault of a young woman, that has caused the by-election!

  2. Monty Zumar says:

    I think Councillor Burnett is right. A complete waste of public money to elect someone for such a short period

  3. rodtharrod says:

    Surely, if none of the Councillors on the Vale Council have a mandate for this unelected ‘extra year’ then none of their decisions taken during this time could stand up in law? Doesn’t it follow that if Councillors aren’t elected for the period, decisions they made during the extra time would fall as unconstitutional? This could include all the major planning applications they’re intent to push through before the election next May. It would be interesting to hear a legal opinion on this matter – or even see someone test the situation in court.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s