PENARTH’S LABOUR COUNCIL MOOTS 11% HIKE IN ITS PRECEPT TAX-TAKE

Most parents and children at the Christmas Festival couldn't see a thing. The event's budget has now been chopped by £5000

Most parents and children at the Christmas Festival couldn’t see a thing – but were almost deafened by the sound system. The event’s budget has now been chopped by £5000

Penarth’s Labour-controlled Town Council is proposing yet another inflation-busting rise in the Penarth local “precept” – the part of the annual council tax bill which is paid by 11,292 local residents  .

Meanwhile the budgets for the heavily-criticised Christmas and Summer Festivals –  and for “Picnic Penarth” –   are being cut . The council-sponsored Christmas Late Night Shopping event is being axed and won’t be held next year.

The concluding vote on the issue also revealed a split in the Conservative Party ranks.

A pipe band led the carnival parade from the Kymin onto the Esplanade at this year's summer festival. Next year walking parades are being axed

A pipe band led the carnival parade from the Kymin onto the Esplanade at this year’s summer festival. Next year walking parades are being axed in both the Christmas and Summer Festivals

The council – which now employs an all-time high of  no less than 20 staff –  set a  draft annual budget of £1,114,112 – the first time the town council’s budget has exceeded a million pounds a year – but then councillors had second thoughts about it.

The council is proposing to increase its  2017/18 budget by well over 10 times the current rate of inflation – hiking up its annual spend by 11% in just 12 months. An internal council report says the proposed budget for 2017/18 has been – as the report puts it –  “uplifted” from £670,406 to £748,235.

That proposed council-tax-precept of  £748,235  – (a tax on the people of  Penarth) –  represents an inflation-busting increase of 11% . [ The rate of UK inflation is currently 1.2%] .

To mitigate the effects of the increase  in the Penarth council-tax local town precept, the council is withdrawing £45,000 from its general reserves to at least partially “offset” the amount it needs to extract from Penarth council-tax payers in 2017/18.

Misleadingly, Penarth Council uses the familiar and widely-discredited claim that on an “average”  Band D property the prospective increase would only amount to an extra £5.95 a year. However as most houses in Penarth aren’t Band D homes ( most are in much higher banding levels),  the town precept charge added to the overall council tax bill for most Penarth residents will be much greater than the so-called “average”.

Penarth Town Council's HQ at West House where last night's Leisure and Amenities Committee meeting was held

Penarth Town Council’s HQ at West House where last night’s Leisure and Amenities Committee meeting was held

When the council’s Leisure and Amenities Committee [which oversees the majority of the council’s activities including allotments, the cemetery, the Paget Rooms and other buildings, and organises the Summer and the Christmas Festivals]  met last night –   cost-cutting was in the air.  

Cllr Mike Cuddy Leader of Penarth Town Council

Cllr Mike Cuddy Mayor and Leader of Penarth Town Council

Hinting at what was to come, the leader of the leader of Penarth Council Cllr Mike Cuddy (Labour St Augustines) told members “We have explored  whether there are opportunities to look afresh at some of the traditional activities” .

Cllr Cuddy – apparently referring to the Summer Festival – said “It’s apparent that some of those activities are costly and don’t draw the crowds as they once did”. He also said there were difficulties relating to “insurance and lorries and traffic management costs “. He said ” Some of the activities this year- which I participated-in as mayor – could be reduced” .

Cllr Cuddy said “We’ve come to the conclusion collectively that we should look for a reduction in parades, and other associated items at Christmas and at the Summer Festival”. 

As a consequence £3,000 is to be cut from the budget of the Summer Festival and £5,000 cut from the budget of the Christmas Festival [ PDN Note: The 2016 Summer Festival was criticised for its lack of a central focus on the Esplanade  – and the Christmas Festival for its lack-lustre production, sub-standard staging, congestion, poor scheduling and over-loud sound amplification].

Cllr Cuddy said that other “experimental activities” like Picnic Penarth could possibly be  funded in other ways including sponsorship. The budget for the 2017 Picnic has been cut by £1,500    [ PDN Note: The second scheduled “Picnic Penarth” event of 2016 had been cancelled at short notice. The event no longer gets a grant from the Vale of Glamorgan Council ]  

Mist and cold kept shoppers away from Penarth's Xmas Late Night Shopping event. There won't be another one

Mist and cold kept shoppers away from Penarth’s Xmas Late Night Shopping event. There won’t be another one

Cllr Cuddy said that the experimental “Late Night Shopping ” event had been held for a second year,  but he said, somewhat-pointedly to councillors  ” I didn’t see too many of you as I wandered around the shops.” . Cllr Cuddy said ” We feel it is an experiment which probably isn’t worth repeating at the moment – so that’s another saving”   .

The total saving from all the above would be about £9,500 he said

Cllr Mark Wilson (Labour Cornerswell ) pointed out that the budget reports also indicated that the budget for “Tourism Projects” had been reduced from £7,500 to  £5,000.

Cllr Gwyn Roberts (Labour St Augustines)

Cllr Gwyn Roberts (Labour St Augustines)

Cllr Gwyn Roberts (Labour St Augustines) said some of the events had been going for a long time and “minor parts” of the Christmas Festival and “Holiday Festival” were being changed . “The walking parade” he said “ is probably not good value for money we’re looking at doing it a different way to make it better and still save a considerable amount of money ” .  

Cllr Anthony Ernest (Conservative Plymouth Ward)

Cllr Anthony Ernest (Conservative Plymouth Ward)

Cllr Anthony Ernest (Conservative Plymouth Ward) said “I’m just trying to get the hang of what’s going on this evening.  We’re talking about figures that ‘haven’t been changed’ – and ‘we’ve done this and we’ve done that’ …. Are you saying that the figures that we have in front of us – as the Conservative Group  – are innaccurate?”

Cllr Rhiannon Birch (Labour Cornerswell)

Cllr Rhiannon Birch (Labour Cornerswell)

Cllr Rhiannon Birch (Labour Cornerswell in the chair) said “We’re working off the same budget as you do – but we’re been thinking about ways of trimming it back even further.”

The Town Clerk Emma Boylen said the budget was “just not up to date at this moment”

Cllr Ernest retorted – “So we’re being asked to approve a budget tonight that is inaccurate? – that’s my interpretation “

Cllr Rhiannon Birch offered more explanation –  and it then transpired that the Labour councillors had met earlier to consider the cuts.  “We’ve all had exactly the same budget . We [ meaning the Labour councillors on the council] had a group meeting and have attempted to trim back some expenditure”.

At this point there was a lot of leafing through financial spreadsheets . Cllr Birch reiterated the proposed Summer Festival cut of £3,000, the Christmas Festival cut of £5,000   the cut of  £1,500 from Picnic Penarth and £2,500 from Tourism  – a total of £12,000 .

Cllr Birch said that the “ambitions of the council, and the age of austerity that we’re living in, mean that we will continue to look for savings throughout the year”.

Penarth Town Councillor Martin Turner (Conservative Plymouth Ward)

Penarth Town Councillor Martin Turner (Conservative Plymouth Ward)

Cllr Martin Turner (Conservative Plymouth Ward) said  he was “a little disappointed that we are not trying to increase income. ” The income projections for the coming year were lower than those of the current year . He said “ With the extra staff that we’ve now got – with the increased numbers – [ Penarth Council employs an all time record of 20 staff] we should be trying to increase – through them – the level of income that we expect from activities.” Cllr Turner cited the example of the Paget Rooms – where no increased income whatsoever was forecast for the coming year. He thought the council ought to be looking at ways to generate “more and more income” . He thought the council was “not being  as ambitions in our incomes are we are in our expenditure”

Cllr Birch reminded Cllr Turner that the council was intending to increase the fees it charges for use of its facilities.

Cllr Gwyn Roberts (Labour St Augustines) said he thought Cllr Turner was right but he thought it would be “imprudent to presume to have an increase in income”  –  nevertheless  the council should attempt “every which way we can, to produce income”.

Cllr Ernest said “The council has always tended to increase its expenditure . If we don’t have that expectation of income coming in, then we should be looking to  refine our budgets much closer.” Cllr Ernest said it was always possible to “vire” [ transfer] between various committee budgets  and asked “Might it not be better to look at the overall budget of the committee – say £20,000 .” Micro-managing”  the budgets , he said,  did not always work out in a small council.

Cllr Mark Wilson (Labour Stanwell)

Cllr Mark Wilson (Labour Stanwell)

Cllr Mark Wilson (Labour Cornerswell) said  the committee should be dedicated to maximizing its income. If the council knew it had unsold tickets for live events  what was being done about it  – at the last moment?  Was the council publicising the event? Was “looking at a discount”?  Were there things the council could be doing that it was not doing? With 20-odd staff in the council we should be saying “let’s do some really strong marketing to sell those tickets “.

Town Clerk Emma Boylen

Town Clerk Emma Boylen

The Town Clerk Emma Boylen said that in order to generate income from hirers [ of the Kymin or Paget Rooms ]   the facilities needed to be offered to more people . Some hirers had been “there for years and years and years”. Offering the facilities to others might mean displacing established hirers . There was an issue as to whether this was“palatable “or not.  Some flexibility was going to be required to move people to other venues.

Cllr Neil Thomas (Labour Cornerswell) chairman of Penarth Town Council planning committee

Cllr Neil Thomas (Labour Cornerswell) chairman of Penarth Town Council planning committee

Cllr Neil Thomas (Labour Cornerswell) although the council would like more income it would be “foolish” to include that in the budget. He thought “Facilities Working Group” should have income generation as part of their remit  – but including enhanced income expectations in the budget would leave what he called “a possible gaping hole  at the end of the year”.

Cllr Turner claimed  “We’ve got a good handle on our expenditure” – but repeated the need to increase income and thought the council should set itself some “targets” rather than “just waiting to see what happens”   .

Kerry-Leigh Hughes – Penarth Council’s Finance and PR officer  – said that  often the council could not forecast what it would make in income. The council could not forecast – for example what it would derive in cemetery fees . On venue hire Ms Hughes had even worse news for the council . She said that when overheads and salary costs were taken into consideration, all the council’s venues [ eg Kymin and Paget Rooms ] were operating at a loss.

Cllr Philip Rapier (Labour St Augustines)

Cllr Philip Rapier (Labour St Augustines)

Cllr Philip Rapier (Labour St Augustine’s) said that based on his experience in the entertainment industry, the correct approach was to “build a client-base, look after it and hang on to it once you’ve got it”. 

Cllr Rapier put the boot into his council colleagues in no uncertain measure.   . The  council carried on – he asserted – “as if the Pier has nothing to do with us”  and that ” the Turner Gallery – which is part of Penarth’s absolutely unique arts offering –  is nothing to do with us”. He said “I’m afraid we’re not helping ourselves as a council” .

Cllr Rhiannon Birch in the chair challenged his view . She said ” I don’t think you can specifically say that they’re nothing to do with us”  

Cllr Rapier came back at her to say “Well, we haven’t taken the other route either  – have we?”  

Cllr Ernest said that on the budget item for “Trees” he noticed that the budget had been reduced from £7,500 to £3,000 . Many members of the council, he said knew there was a lot of concern about the state of trees in the town.

Cllr Wilson  – responding later – said the council was spending “15 times more on trees”. The initial projection was £200 but the figure was now £3,000  – which amounted  – he asserted – to an increase of  1500% 

Cllr Ernest asked why the budget was £7,500 if only £150 had been spent ? Cllr Wilson said “Let’s put it this way – we are where we are now”

The unkempt appearance of Penarth cemetery was criticised earlier this year

The unkempt appearance of Penarth cemetery was criticised earlier this year

Cllr Ernest also noted the Penarth Cemetery budgets had been scalped by £6,000. He said the cemetery was much-valued public facility. “I know it’s a very expensive estate to maintain” but he thought that be taking £1,000 away from the amount allocated to footpaths and roads “could be difficult for us”. In the past very large sums had  been required to reinstate paths. He said the budget for cemetery development had been halved  from £10,000 to £5,000 .

The Kymin on Beach Rd Penarth is owned by the Vale of Glamrorgan Council but leased to Penarth Town Council

The Kymin on Beach Rd Penarth is owned by the Vale of Glamrorgan Council but leased to Penarth Town Council

Cllr Ernest also noted that a £3,000 budget for improving energy efficiency in the Kymin and for the removal of a restrictive covenant on the property had been reduced to zero. Was this now something the council considered “not very important” ?

The Town Clerk explained that the covenant was still being dealt with and the money budgeted for insulation at the Kymin had been spent.

CONSERVATIVE SPLIT IN FINAL VOTE

The Conservative Group on Penarth Town Council (left to right) Cllr Anthony Ernest, Cllr Clive Williams, Cllr Martin Turner and Cllr Wendy van den Brom

The Conservative Group on Penarth Town Council (left to right) Cllr Anthony Ernest, Cllr Clive Williams, Cllr Martin Turner and Cllr Wendy van den Brom

There were 14 councillors present at last night’s meeting . A “show of hands” vote on motion to accept the budget with a reduction in expenditure of £12,000 revealed a split in the Conservative ranks on the council

Only 2  of the Conservative councillors Cllrs Ernest and Cllr Clive Williams (Conservative Plymouth Ward ) voted AGAINST the Labour motion . 10 councillors voted FOR it.

The other 2 Conservative councillors, Cllr Martin Turner and Cllr Wendy van den Brom  (Conservative Plymouth Ward), decided not to follow the lead of their own party group and did not support their two Conservative colleagues.

Behind it all is a simmering row between Penarth Conservative Association president Cllr Clive Williams MBE (who is both a Vale and Penarth Town Councillor for Plymouth Ward)  and Cllr Martin Turner who, with members of his family, was involved in the “selection process” which eliminated Cllr Williams from standing again for election as a Vale councillor for Plymouth Ward in next May’s local election.

 

About NewsNet

Penarth Daily News email address dmj@newsnet.uk . Penarth Daily News is an independent free on-line fair and balanced news service published by NewsNet Ltd covering the town of Penarth in the Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, UK. All our news items are based on the information we receive or discover at the time of publication and are published on the basis that they are accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief at that time. Comments posted on the site by commentators reflect their opinions and are not necessarily shared, endorsed or supported by Penarth Daily News.
This entry was posted in Penarth Daily News. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to PENARTH’S LABOUR COUNCIL MOOTS 11% HIKE IN ITS PRECEPT TAX-TAKE

  1. sep says:

    Very disappointed if there won’t be another Christmas late night shopping event. There did seem to be less people around than last year but I managed to buy a few presents and join in the Christmas cheer. I did think more retailers could have stayed open late – but, as per usual, many of them had shut up shop at 5 (or was it 4.40 ish as I often see?). I had also expected to see some stalls lining the pavements.

  2. Peter Church says:

    What really annoys me is this figure of 774k is used just to calculate the Band D precept, but in Penarth most homes are E,F,G,H and even I so what is collected is far in excess of this figure.
    Does the excess come to Penarth, NO it get re-distributed to poorer town councils in the Vale, I won’t tell you which one but it starts with a B and ends in Y and has “Lis Burnett” in the Middle!!

    11% “Labour addicted to spending your money”

  3. Concerned Citizen says:

    By the time Alun Michael had added his bit for more office grandeur and an even bigger salary, we shall all be bankrupt!

  4. Chris David says:

    What the hell is all this about. Leafing through spread sheets! Squabbling over xyz. Don’t the council plan through the year and discuss budgets as they evolve? Don’t they have final budgets with outline plans well in advance to discuss at the annual budget summary meeting? This as reported is a joke and if it was a company it would quickly go under. And why is the tax payer forking out £9,500 for a late shopping event? Please explain that one. It all appears from this article very amateurish!

  5. Clive Pleasants says:

    I think 11% rise is totally unacceptable for all these things which a lot of people in Penarth don’t use, Would all you good councillors arrange for all the pensioners in Penarth to get a rise to compensate for these extra outgoings. The local residents who don’t go to these attractions or visit the local cemetery should not have to pay the extra 11%, we should put it to the vote of the 11292 local residents.

  6. J Tate says:

    they don’t stop putting council tax up here we are much higher than cardiff

    >

  7. bizzilizzi says:

    Could we have an account of what the functions of 20 staff are.

  8. Anne says:

    If they stopped wasting money all the time, as they want to now, on badly designed brutalist style benches and recently the bunker (viewing platform) at Penarth Head and got their 20 staff to work on a realistic budget rather than trying to work it out on the back of an envelope at a labour pre-meeting we might get somewhere. They could raise money by charging for the use of the Westhouse for Cllrs surgeries for example. What has the tree budget been spent on? Cutting down trees unnecessarily, like the proposed felling of the tree outside the Westhouse? They haven planted any street trees. As well as rewriting the budget they should have taken the opportunity to discuss the labour partys plan to bring wakeboarding to Cosmeston lakes paying heed to the petition that showed so many oppose. this and want to keep Cosmeston as a peaceful nature reserve. Cant they say NO to the Vale Labour party cabinet? What about the Turner gallery? What about our conservation areas?

  9. Harry says:

    Why do the Council have to be involved in the Late Night Opening – surely that’s up to retailers deciding for themselves

  10. Thomas Jones says:

    Hi,

    The scandal of the Council Tax and the Welsh Assembly re-banding is becoming a joke.
    10 years ago my council tax was about £800 now its over £2000
    The extra bits just keep on going up at huge multiples of inflation, while my income has been flat for most of the time.
    Don’t worry the Vale Council will send out some propaganda leaflet explaining why they are such good value, printed in English and Welsh at your expense.
    Sometimes I wish I lived in Barry as my small terraced house would be Band A or B there, here its Band F and why? because there is a posh school nearby (which is 99% white and middle class)

    TJ

  11. martin houghton says:

    This bunch of relics need to retire to obscurity. The ancient ritual of appointing parochial power- hungry nobodies to rule over relatively tiny populations, appointed by a minority of them too, needs a radical overhaul. ‘Local government’ is a misnomer. This one we’re lumbered with resembles a bunch of amateur actors trying to put on play without truly understanding what the play is about, and then failing to turn up for most of the rehearsals! If nobody voted in the relevant elections a rethink would, I imagine, be ordered. That’s unlikely, so pressure needs to be applied to the top tier. Let’s get on with it!

  12. I was told years ago that the Council had a policy to’ plant a tree for everyone cut down,’ the person who told me this works for the Council and I added , ‘but they don’t keep to that policy and he added, ‘I cannot remember the last time we planted any new trees’ . That told to me a while ago but I think the lack of tree replacement is still in place.

  13. CelticMan says:

    I can think of an easy way to save £774k – can you?

  14. Jean Thomas says:

    Think how much we could save if we only had one councillor per ward

  15. Ralf says:

    I’m reminded of a saying :
    “A committee is a group that can do nothing individually, but can collectively decide that nothing can be done”

Comments are closed.