Stephen Doughty - addressing the largely empty chamber - said it was a pleasure "to see so many colleagues from across Wales here today"

Stephen Doughty – addressing the largely empty Westminster Hall debating chamber – said it was a pleasure “to see so many colleagues from across Wales here today”

Stephen Doughty the Labour MP for Cardiff South and Penarth has again re-iterated his support for the controversial  Penarth/Cardiff Tidal Lagoon scheme  – this time in a parliamentary debate.

The scheme involves building a huge lagoon wall from Cardiff to a point in line with Penarth Pier and placing more than 90-turbines in the waters immediately off Penarth – wrecking the view North East from Penarth and creating difficulties for ships and boats using the Wrach Channel into Cardiff Docks, Cardiff Bay and Penarth Marina.

The 90 turbines of the Tidal Lagoon would be nearer Penarth than anywhere else

The 90 turbines of the Tidal Lagoon would be nearer Penarth than anywhere else

Doughty was speaking in a largely deserted debate – which he himself had initiated – on the motion that “This House has considered the effect of the UK leaving the EU on infrastructure in Wales”.

The Prime Minister Theresa May

The Prime Minister Theresa May

Doughty criticised the Prime Minister Theresa May, for not chosing to make her speech on EU membership in Parliament [ Mrs May was also not present at Doughty’s debate] saying “this would not have happened under Churchill, it wouldn’t have happened under Thatcher, but this lady doesn’t seem to be for turning-up when it comes to  this place and this issue.” – a comment which failed to register with the few MPs present.

On the tidal lagoon project Doughty said : “I have long supported the principle of tidal power coming from the Severn estuary. There have been concerns about some of the projects proposed, but I am interested in, and support, the proposals for tidal lagoons. Obviously each needs to be judged on its own merits—and particularly the Swansea one. So much work has gone into that and it is crucial that we now provide certainty on delivery and funding to enable it to go ahead.”

Stephen Doughty (Labour Cardiff South and Penarth) in the Westminster Hall debate

Stephen Doughty (Labour Cardiff South and Penarth) in the Westminster Hall debate

Returning to tidal lagoons later in the proceedings, he said “Many prospective infrastructure projects are yet to be properly finalised, such as the Swansea Bay City Deal, the North Wales growth deal,  the South Wales metro, which I raised in a previous debate and is of great concern to my constituents in Cardiff South and Penarth and of course the tidal lagoons.”

He added “Of course, the uncertainty around those projects has not only been caused by the referendum result; there are other factors at play, but that is a crucial part of whether those projects go forward”.

Parliamentary Undersecretary for Wales Guto Bebb

Parliamentary Undersecretary for Wales Guto Bebb

Responding –  Guto Bebb the Parliamentary Under Secretary for Wales  – said : “Those of us who support the concept of tidal lagoons undoubtedly welcome the Hendry report, which was published last Thursday. News broke of Charles Hendry’s positive comments while I was at the mobile infrastructure summit in Cardiff Bay. The report was positive, but it was complex, too, and it needs to be looked at in-depth. I sincerely hope that the Government will be able to respond in due course from a financial point of view to the issues with the cost of the tidal lagoon and the impact on the taxpayer and the electricity consumer. There is no doubt that the report was positive and needs to be taken seriously within Government. When the report was commissioned, many people said that the issue was being kicked into the long grass, but if they were looking for a negative report, that was not what they received. We are looking at the matter carefully, but there are no doubt issues still to be addressed over the next few months.”

About NewsNet

Penarth Daily News email address . Penarth Daily News is an independent free on-line fair and balanced news service published by NewsNet Ltd covering the town of Penarth in the Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, UK. All our news items are based on the information we receive or discover at the time of publication and are published on the basis that they are accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief at that time. Comments posted on the site by commentators reflect their opinions and are not necessarily shared, endorsed or supported by Penarth Daily News.
This entry was posted in Penarth Daily News. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. sep says:

    Oh he is soooo funny. I hope those that voted for him are pleased with what they got.

  2. Joe blow says:

    It certainly will destroy the view. Instead of a clear view up to the Severn bridges we will gave a 10 mile, 50 foot high wall of rubble to look at extending out almost in line with the end of the pier.

  3. Peter Church says:

    He could stand in front of some wind turbines and make a speech.
    The amount of ‘hot air’ would keep the lights on in most of Wales.
    Hands up, who actually voted for him in Penarth?
    So just you then Lyndsay!!!

  4. Frank Evans says:

    Should be known as the Cardiff East and Newport West barrage. Don’t think the doubty constituency intersects it.

  5. Dr Ceinwen Sawyer says:

    I just wish someone (from any Party) would make GETTING INTO WALES just after the toll bridge a priority not hair-brained tidal power schemes (until Swansea is proven efficient). Talk about a third world transport infrastructure. The drive is a fraught with danger, overcrowded, miserable, time consuming entry into our Home country. Perhaps Doughty should be out ‘n’ about more…why not pop into the Railway Pub Penarth one evening and talk to older experienced businessmen for a start, or visit a ladies keep fit class, or just sit in a café and hold court and listen……!

  6. Big Davey says:

    And they harp on about the Cardiff Metro as a solution.

    That is a 20th century solution, we need a 21st century road infrastructure not hard wired rail and tram system.

Comments are closed.